8MM FORUM WORLDWIDE
https://8mmforumworldwide.com/

CASTLE FILMS - lenght vs cost. What's your opinion?
https://8mmforumworldwide.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=1596
Page 2 of 2

Author:  Roger Cathey [ Wed May 14, 2014 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CASTLE FILMS - lenght vs cost. What's your opinion?

Son of Frankenstein on 400ft U8 is another one of those that don't come around very often. When both U8 and Castle are combined they do tend to bring a higher price.

Author:  Jeff Missinne [ Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CASTLE FILMS - lenght vs cost. What's your opinion?

Castle films have a better reputation for picture quality than Universal 8. According to Scott MacGillivray's book, Castle rarely worked from anything other than 35mm fine grain master material. U-8, in an effort to get a large number of titles on the market in a hurry, used 16mm master material, sometimes even "duping" portions of Castle release prints. [set5_b/set5_b/dupe.gif] Their editing was also sometimes sloppy; their version of Hitchcock's "Frenzy" actually omitted the scene in which the detective discovers the clue that "cracks" the case (I had to splice it in from a Castle print or the U-8 digest made no sense!)

Author:  Roger Cathey [ Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CASTLE FILMS - lenght vs cost. What's your opinion?

Agreed. There is no doubt that Castle did a better job in their prints than U8. I just enjoy the films and opt for a longer version.

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/